Share This

  1. *Customize this email by writing something in the Comments field.

All Fields
« Select a new subject area

Start Here

Select a topic and subtopic

    1. Thesis topic selection
    2. Proposals
    3. Committee selection
    4. Writing
    5. Defending
    6. Submitting
    7. Publishing
    8. Advisor relationships
    1. Literature review
    2. Organization of Research
    3. Presentation of Research
    4. Lab bench work
    5. Research Integrity
    6. Research Collaboration
    7. Comprehensives & Qualifiers
    1. Resume/CV
    2. Professional networking
    3. Getting new job postings
    4. Interviewing tips
    5. Academic
    6. Non-Academic
    7. Post-doctoral fellowships
    1. Techniques
    2. Code of conduct
    3. Campus instructional office
    4. Syllabus and grading
    5. Student complaints
    6. Learning styles
    1. Grant proposals
    2. Financial Aid/Student Loans
    3. Getting help from University Research Office
    4. Working with funding agencies
    1. Copyright issues
    2. Peer-review
    3. Conferences
    4. Building your CV
    5. Journals
    6. Open access publishing
    7. Books
    1. Time/Stress management
    2. Family Issues
    3. Campus life
    4. Physical and psychological wellness

Sponsored by ProQuest®

GradShare is a free service of ProQuest, a research solutions company.

Learn More


Expert Advice: All Topics

Track this Expert AdviceInfo< Back

Well-Executed Literature Review

by Craig Emerson - Vice President - Editorial Operations, Proquest

A well-executed Literature Review can eliminate hours of wasted effort and help build a solid foundation on which to construct your research. It will show you what is already known, what needs to be known, and how to develop your research methodology.

In General:

  • It's easy to digress when searching the literature. Formulate clear questions that your Review will answer, and don't deviate from them.
  • Finding information is easy. A critical appraisal of what you find is more difficult, but crucial. Avoid the urge to identify, acquire and assimilate all articles that may possibly be of interest.
  • Fully document all aspects of your Review, including objectives, sources used, searches conducted, and date and time. It's easy to duplicate efforts if you don't keep adequate notes.

Specifically:

  • Canvass your peers, your supervisory committee, and top researchers in your field for their opinion of the "top 10" publications relevant to your research. Within these articles, mine the Cited References for additional content.
  • Contact your Librarian to determine what literature search tools are available[1]. Bibliographic databases are tailored to specific subjects; those databases with links to full text will save time. Set up saved-search ?alerts' that will identify relevant content as it becomes published.
  • "Review" publications[2], high-quality journals, and conference proceedings should be given high priority, but recognize that this content is >1-2 years old. Looking at funding-agency submissions[3], upcoming conference agenda, and pre-print servers will bring you up-to-date.
  • Organize your literature citations with the help of online reference managers (e.g. Refworks[4]).
  • Rank each relevant source you find, based on source quality (see Eigenfactor[5]), author qualifications[6], and of course, relevance to your objective.
  • Don't ignore non-traditional content sources, particularly for analytical techniques (e.g. software manuals for statistical analysis), federal and state labs (e.g. analytical chemistry) and international organizations (e.g. UNESCO http://unesdoc.unesco.org).

    [1] ProQuest Central
    [2] Annual Review journals; www.annualreviews.org 6 October 2008
    [3] NSF Funding Awards https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/servlet/A6RecentWeeks 6 October 2008 (and see COS Funding Opportunities)
    [4] RefWorks Bibliographic Manager
    [5] Eigenfactor Organization (http://www.eigenfactor.org/ 6 October 2008)
    [6] COS Funding Opportunities

Craig Emerson

About the author

Craig has 11 years of research experience, and holds a BSc, MSc and PhD. For the last 13 years, he has been working in the Content Operations division of ProQuest.

  Related Items from GradShare

Comments: 1
  1. badge-5

    • Vote:  Vote Up 0 Vote Down 0 Flag   
    • Reply

Add Your Comment

 
Publish this comment incognito as FirstAuthor Info
 

Comments must adhere to our Terms of Use

Please select a Subject




Welcome to GradShare. Please select your field.





  1. Remember me  

  2. Forgot password?

Register to use GradShare!

I agree to GradShare's Terms and Conditions

Thank you for registering! Now you can participate in discussions and get updates on new questions in your subject area. Please start by picking your department from the options on the right. This will help us recommend useful tools provided by your university.



Verify your account

Make sure to check your university email account for our registration letter. You must verify your account in order to complete your registration. If you don't use your university email regularly, you can set up a preferred email address under the "My Profile" section.



You've joined the one community where graduate students help each other succeed, so ask your questions and don't forget to answer questions for others. Welcome to GradShare!



Close